Hi Matt. My perception is that smaller events are easier to organise and are therefore easier to run well. Organisers have a lower expectation as regards numbers turning up as the events are intended to be smaller and/or local with a narrow focus. Plus, attendees don't expect the world. It may be then that these events
are doing well and I haven't any data to show that they aren't but then I'd also like to see data to prove that they are. How are we measuring their success? For example, I remember recently that the club was offered a stand (free IIRC), at a show and we didn't get 1 taker. From a membership of over 500!?
As regards ND, there have been some serious financial issues in recent years due to various problems. Some relate to a lack of attendance, some around a lack of committee coherence and other general problems. There is no doubt that big changes are needed in the way this event is organised and delivered by the club (according to the demand for it).
As for the club in general, you say only small changes are needed. What are they in your opinion? Because if we only discuss it at the AGM, then only a small % of the club's members will be able to take part in the debate.